Once upon a time, in the golden age of casual gaming, Plants vs. Zombies was a beloved oddball in every player’s garden. With quirky humor, catchy music, and deceptively strategic gameplay, the original game spawned a fan base that spanned the globe.
But over time, what started as a delightful tower defense game slowly withered under the scorching heat of corporate greed and creative missteps. Fans who once took pride in their peashooters were left with a franchise that no longer felt like home.
So, what exactly went wrong?
click to enlarge
+ 5Released in May 2009 at a fair price of $2.99 by PopCap Games, Plants vs. Zombies bloomed onto PC and Mac before expanding to consoles and handhelds. Its success wasn’t just a fluke — the game was bursting with charm.
Each plant had a personality, each zombie was hilarious, and the gameplay loop was perfectly balanced. It was easy to pick up, hard to master, and infinitely replayable. It didn’t need flashy graphics or multiplayer battles — it was a masterpiece of simplicity, humor, and fun.
It earned its spot alongside classics like Angry Birds and Cut the Rope, becoming a touchstone of early digital gaming.
click to enlarge+ 5But then came the mobile era — and with it, a shift in the gaming landscape. When Plants vs. Zombies 2: It’s About Time launched in 2013, fans were excited for more of the same magic. At first glance, it looked promising — new worlds, new plants, and time-traveling zombies.
But beneath the glossy surface lurked a dark truth: microtransactions had taken root. The game, billed as free-to-play, was actually pay-to-win in nature. Difficulty spikes were no longer just challenges; they were walls.
Players were nudged — and sometimes shoved — towards paying to buy power-ups and plants to progress. What once was a celebration of creativity became a storefront with a side of gameplay.
click to enlarge+ 5And just when fans thought it couldn’t get worse, Plants vs. Zombies 3 arrived. Initially soft-launched in 2020, it was ultimately released in 2024. It has been reworked multiple times, but still feels like a hollow shell of its former self.
Gone were the vibrant 2D graphics, replaced with a blander 3D art style that lacked soul. The grid-based strategy was muddled, and microtransactions were more present than ever. The essence of PvZ — its charm, its design, its humor — had been buried beneath a mountain of mobile game monetization tactics. It felt less like a game and more like a chore. Fans of the series just couldn't love it as much as they loved the first.
click to enlarge+ 5Ironically, while the mainline games wilted, the franchise’s spin-offs found surprising success. Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare and its sequels turned the series into a team-based third-person shooter that somehow worked.
These spin-offs embraced the series’ goofiness and carved out a dedicated community. Even PvZ: Battle for Neighborville had its moments, proving that the world of PvZ still had life in it, just not in the way fans initially loved.
click to enlarge+ 5In the end, it wasn’t just bad decisions that killed Plants vs. Zombies — it was the erosion of what made it special. The shift from fun to finance turned loyal fans into disillusioned players.
But hope isn’t lost. Franchises have been revived before, and perhaps, someday, Plants vs. Zombies will return to its roots. Until then, we’ll water our nostalgia and dream of the day we fall in love with a peashooter all over again.
For more articles like this, take a look at our Features and Mobile Games page.